Mailing List
Join our mailing list:

Minimum Seismic Base Shear and How It Relates to Drift Determination

Posted Date: 15 Dec 2014

ASCE 7-10 Section 12.8.1.1 sets forth the following minimum base shear equations:

1. Cs shall not be less than Cs = 0.044SDSIe ≥ 0.01  (Equation 12.8-5)

2. Cs shall not be less than (0.5S1)/(R/Ie) when S1 is equal to or greater than 0.6g   (Equation 12.8-6)

In order to better understand these required minimums, a little history about why they exist is helpful.

Cs ≥ 0.044SDSIe — Following the 1933 Long Beach earthquake, the California Riley Act required every building to be designed for a minimum service-level seismic force equal to 3 percent of its weight. This minimum requirement eventually became seismic zone-dependent in the Uniform Building Code (UBC). In the 1997 UBC, this minimum base shear was brought up to strength level and was made soil-dependent; it became 0.11CaIW — where Ca was a function of Z, the Seismic Zone Factor, and of the soil characteristics at the site of the structure; I was the importance factor; and W was the effective seismic weight. In the 2000 NEHRP Provisions, this minimum base shear became 0.044SDSIW, based on SDS = 2.5Ca.

Cs ≥ 0.01 — This minimum is intended to provide a nominal level of structural integrity that will improve the performance of buildings in the event of a possible earthquake.

Cs ≥ (0.5S1)/(R/Ie) when S1 is equal to or greater than 0.6g — Following the 1994 Northridge Earthquake, a lower-bound on the design base shear, applicable in Seismic Zone 4 only, was added to the 1997 UBC. This minimum was specifically intended to account for the large displacement and velocity pulses that were observed in near-fault ground motion in the Northridge earthquake. A corresponding minimum was added to the 1997 NEHRP Provisions. This minimum was originally applicable to structures assigned to SDC E and F only. In the 2000 IBC, this equation was also made applicable to all structures located where the mapped MCE spectral response acceleration at 1-second period, S1, equaled or exceeded 0.6g, which is roughly equivalent to Zone 4 of the 1997 UBC. The applicability of this minimum value is the same in ASCE 7-10 as it is in the 2000 IBC.

Q1.  Do these minimum base shear equations apply when determining drift?

A1. In accordance with ASCE 7-10 Section 12.8.6.1 shown below, Eq. 12.8-6 applies, but Eq. 12.8-5 need not apply.

12.8.6.1 Minimum Base Shear for Computing Drift

The elastic analysis of the seismic force-resisting system for computing drift shall be made using the prescribed seismic design forces of Section 12.8.

EXCEPTION: Eq. 12.8-5 need not be considered for computing drift.

Q2.  Why doesn’t Eq. 12.8-5 need to apply?

A2.  Again, a little history will help answer the question.

Cs ≥ 0.044SDSIe — The 1997 UBC exempted the minimum base shear of 0.044SDSIW from drift computation, but not without a lot of controversy surrounding it. This exemption was not adopted by ASCE 7-02, ASCE 7-05, or the first four editions of the IBC. Now the exemption has been brought back in ASCE 7-10. This change is significant when it comes to the design of tall buildings. Tall buildings are drift-controlled, rather than strength-controlled. The design of many tall buildings prior to ASCE 7-10, irrespective of seismic design category, has likely been governed, in the absence of this exemption, by drift computed under the 0.044SDSIW minimum. Many consider this to be unreasonable, since this minimum design base shear is essentially a minimum strength requirement, with its magnitude arbitrarily set.

Cs ≥ 0.01 — ASCE 7-05 required that the 0.01 minimum be used for drift determination if it governed. However, this seldom controlled because it is such a low value. With ASCE 7-10, this minimum was bundled with Cs ≥ 0.044SDSIe in Eq. 12.8-5, and therefore, it does not need to be applied for drift computation.

Cs ≥ (0.5S1)/(R/Ie) when S1 is equal to or greater than 0.6g —ASCE 7-10 requires that the 0.5S1/(R/Ie)W minimum be used for drift determination if it governs. This minimum is not exempt and should not be exempt from use in drift determination because it has a physical basis.